Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Storage Facilities

There was a great article in the Boston Globe that someone forwarded to me about self storage "condos".

In storage condos, a place for gear, play

Michael Hunt was tired of keeping his fishing boat and Mercedes convertible under tarps next to his house in Post Falls, Idaho. His prized recreational vehicle was slowly falling apart after spending a few winters outside. With no room left in his garage, he wasn't sure what to do.

Instead of selling his house, moving to a warmer state, or getting rid of his toys, he bought a storage condominium a few miles away in Coeur d'Alene, where he could keep everything under one roof. Then he bought another one for his home office and business files. Three years and $119,000 later, his storage units have become a second home, a place where he plays games with his children, works, and shelters his vehicles.

"I have fun when I'm here and so do my kids," Hunt said of his makeshift getaway. "Our house is a toy box, and this is much quieter."

People like Hunt, with more toys than space, are spending tens of thousands of dollars to keep their weekend wheels and gear in high style. In response, a growing number of self-storage units are ditching the bright lights, long hallways, and sterile atmosphere to become destinations unto themselves.

Some, like the units Hunt owns at GarageTown USA in Coeur d'Alene, are bought and sold like homes and come with cable television, high-speed Internet, individual thermostats, and even clubhouses.

"Everybody has stuff," Carri Berglund, GarageTown USA's national sales and marketing director, said as she was showing off the units in Coeur d'Alene, one of the company's 19 sites. "This is what you don't want in your house."

These large storage areas, which top out at 2,000 square feet, hold not only sports cars and skiing equipment, but also pool tables and personal gyms, or as in Hunt's case, a batting cage.

From the outside, the Idaho garages look like industrial warehouses with metal siding, roofs and roll-up doors. Step inside, and the units can resemble an art gallery or rec room. They have become places where people want to linger for a televised football game or a poker game in the clubhouse or just hang out with other condo owners.

At the clubhouse in Coeur d'Alene, a leather sofa and chairs sit near a kitchen with granite countertops. In September, Berglund brought in caterers and turned one unit into a buffet line, another into a wine-tasting area, and served dessert in another. Over 250 people came to the event, which ran until midnight. Some members have held summer barbecues.

Every state in the country has self-storage units, but most of those are rentals. Those storage units sold as condos are typically found only in spots with second homes, resorts or heavy winters where people have a lot of winter gear.

Some, like Airport Garages in Steamboat Springs, Colo., sell units at small airports where second-home owners can store their planes, cars, RVs, and winter gear. In Ohio, Storage Condominiums designs its garages for out-of-towners who want to keep their boats and RVs around nearby Lake Erie. Premier Storage Condominiums in Yuma, Ariz., caters to RV owners who want to keep their rigs in Arizona for winter travel and offers 60-foot wide driveways, dump stations and extra long spaces.

With more storage options to choose from - there is now enough space to cover Manhattan three times, according to the Self Storage Association in Alexandria, Va. - rental companies are also adding amenities to stand out.

At Hollywood Storage Center, a rental facility in Newbury Park, Calif., there are movie posters on the walls, wine-tasting rooms, a kitchen, and even a post office. For Christmas, there were free photos with Santa Claus with cocoa and chocolate chip cookies.

"We've done all kinds of wild things here. It generates more traffic for us and that means more storage units that we'll be able to rent," said Jay Sundher, who owns the 300,000-square-foot facility. "All these things get people in a good mood, and it becomes a place where they want to hang out with their friends."

At the condo garages, spaces, which generally cost from $68,000 to $200,000, can range from simple metal shells with concrete floors to spacious units with epoxy floors and built-in mezzanines. GarageTown's units in Coeur d'Alene cost about $57,000 to $85,950.

"This can be a cheaper alternative than building on your own property," said Chris Sonne, a managing director at Cushman Wakefield in Irvine, Calif., who tracks the self-storage market.

For many owners, the garages are a bargain. Some have downsized and no longer have a basement or garage big enough to store all their gear. Others live in subdivisions that do not allow them to build sheds or shops.

© Copyright The New York Times Company

Monday, March 24, 2008

Turf Field Approved

Tonight the BoC voted 6-1 to give the school district $250 K towards artificial turf for Prevost field at the high school. As I discussed in a previous post, it isn't about the turf.... It is about the process, and spending money we don't have. I note that no one, not citizen or Commish, bothered to ask about the poor condition of all of our fields......

Friday, March 21, 2008

Can you "splain somethin" Lucy? what is hardship?

I routinely watch, or attend, zoning hearing board meetings. I must say that I have some trouble understanding the use of the term "hardship" as the basis for granting zoning relief. Most of the confusion for me is with development/re-development proposals, not with individual home issues. For example, last night I was in attendance for the presentation for a proposal regarding a public storage facility for north Wayne, and the major hardship that appeared to be presented was that the developer wanted to maximize profit potential for the site. Didn't the folks know the rules when they purchased the property? If not, shame on them, but I don't believe we have an obligation to cover their errors.

The other item that sticks in my craw is the proported "justification" that "all the other properties in the district don't conform." Well maybe these other properties were grandfathered into "non-conformance" by the imposition on new zoning. And of course when we impose new zoning we can not make existing properties conform. Also, isn't it amusing how the developer wants to play both sides ... for example, Cowan alley is not a street but they wish to use it for an access, or the backyard is on Pennsylvania and the front yard on Plant BUT the main entrance will be on PA and the gate on Plant will be kept closed and locked.

By the way, the construction of these three large, three story barn like structures will have a significant impact of the community. And we haven't begun to discuss issues such as traffic or lighting or noise.

Stay tuned.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Historic Preservation

Found this on The Save Ardmore Blog...


PA Township News MARCH 2008:Historic Preservation: Preserving Pennsylvania's History/Townships Must Consider Historic Resources When Planning for The Future

Land use and open space planning are hot topics in many townships these days. In fact, developers often run up against a community’s desire to preserve its green spaces and rural character. It is less common to hear that citizens are resisting development because they fear a loss of historic resources. Yet, under Pennsylvania law, such as the Local Historic District Act of 1961 and the History Code of 1988, townships are authorized and, in some cases, required to consider the preservation of historic resources when planning future development......20th century.... Over the last 50 years, the definition of “historic resources” has expanded from sites and buildings associated with great men and events to a far broader,almost environmental approach. A variety of sites and structures that help us understand how our predecessors lived and worked may now be considered historic resources.

....The focus in the historic preservation movement has gradually shifted from the preservation of individual historic sites to the preservation of those features that provide each municipality with its unique character and identity,or “sense of place.” Consequently, historic preservation considerations should play a central role in any comprehensive plan that seeks to maintain the unique character of a community whilea ccommodating growth and change. ...The public interest in preserving historic resources and a sense of place is well-established in Pennsylvania law. The Local Historic District Act of 1961 authorized municipalities to “createand define, by ordinance, a historic district or districts within the geographic limit or limits of such political subdivision.” The 1971 Environmental Rights Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution provides that “The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and aesthetic values of the environment.” (emphasis added)With the enactment of the Pennsylvania History Code of 1988, the commonwealth sought to add “teeth” to the broad provisions of the Environmental Rights Amendment. Among its other provisions, the code charges the state and municipalities with preserving historic resources within their jurisdiction.....Townships are required by several state laws to provide for the preservation of historic areas and structures

....Virtually any historic site may be considered a potential archaeological site. In addition, Section 510 of the History Code requires townships to consult with the commission “on the design and proposed location of any project,building, or other undertaking financed in whole or in part by Commonwealth funds which may affect the preservation and development of a district, site, orbuilding listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.” This would include any road improvement projects that use PennDOT funding....Perhaps the most significant provi-sion of the History Code is Section 512,which provides legal standing to any “person or other legal entity” to “maintain an action in an administrative tribunal or court for the protection or preservation of any historic resource in this Commonwealth.” Because the term “historic resource” is not defined in the act and remains largely undefined by appellate case law, this provision would appear to give broad standing to almost anyone who wishes to sue to protect something that he or she considers a“historic resource.”....

Thursday, March 13, 2008

To turf or not to turf, that is the question

What an amazing show at the BOC Meeting Monday Night.. The issue was should Radnor Township pony up one third of the cost of a turf field at the high school. Of course that means that that the tax payers pay two thirds.
I don't have a position on turf. I can understand both sides of the discussion. Curious that the Parks and Rec Board discussed this at least 10 years ago but we were shot down and told the issue was a "no-starter".
Why I do object to is the way we do business. Much like the last turf field, there is a private donor and a deadline... a gun held to the head, as it were. This time however, the fix is in. The decision to do this was made last fall....
And isn't it curious that the estimates for Sulpizio gym conversion are high by almost the amount that the Township is being asked to kick in.....

Sunday, March 09, 2008

Some Musing on a Sunday Morning

Sub-prime mortgage crisis – Why foreclose?

I know the fiasco is very complex and convoluted but let’s not make it even worse. Foreclosures result in empty houses, empty houses degrade neighborhoods, degraded neighborhoods lower property values, etc etc. So, wouldn’t it make sense for lenders to try to work something out with folks (primary residents) to keep them in their homes?

As for speculative buyers, that is a different. Flip this house? No, just flip this…. And how about the institutions that fueled this insanity? Methinks we are headed for another “savings and loan” type of bailout. And there will be little accountability to the “robber barons” who profited.

There are many causes for this crisis, all rooted in greed. Interesting to look at these “bubbles” and note that they seem to burst when the “common man” gets involved. When every Joe or Jane thinks they can make a quick fortune you are headed for trouble. I can’t remember where I read this but one a the big financiers who survived the stock market crash said he knew it was time to get out of the market when he started getting stock tips from his shoe shine boy.

Impeachment

From my viewpoint we need impeachment but not to “get” George W. We need it to restore the constitution. So much has gone wrong in the last seven years because the constitution was trampled. Not only the President has been at fault but Congress essentially abdicated.

Oil prices

Most folks I talk to like to blame the oil exporters, the growth of the Chinese or Indian marketplace or government regulation for the oil situation. I wonder if most folks have paid attention to the growth of investment fund into the speculative oil marketplace? The info I have seen that there has been a growth of this type of “oil trading” of one to two orders of magnitude. By the way, who has investments in these funds? Probably all of us, especially in pension funds and 401’s. So next time you fill up instead of thinks of the cost, consider the growth of your investment!

Democratic Primary

Well thank heavens we will finally have some say in the race for the White House. When was the last time this happened? I only regret is that the race is turning nasty. Why do Dems have the need to devour their own? The race is close because the candidates are very similar in their positions. So why not talk about their approaches to solving the problems. As we know there are many routes to a solution some of which may not work. So how will these candidates “get there”? By the way, how much experience did Bill Clinton have when he took office? What a bogus issue. The candidates need to differentiate themselves without going negative. They also need to begin the run for November by showing that they will s

Sunday, March 02, 2008

HARB Meeting this week.

As you may know, the HARB denied a certificate to a developer to tear down two building on Bloomingdale as part ofa project to construct several homes. The Commissioners remanded the decision to the HARB to include an evaluation of the economics of the situation. I will not comment on the merits of the project, one way or the other, but it doesn't seem appropriate to me that economics is a valid criteria for their consideration. I leave that evaluation up to the Commissioner's. The developer should lay out these facts and the BOC should balance this against the HARB's advice and make a decision.

This situation highlights a need I discussed during my campaign, namely the need for some form of redevelopment authority. If we as a community value our historical structures then we need some tools to preserve them. For example, tax forgiveness and grants could be provided to individuals who wished to restore the properties and then live in them for a few years. Think about that.... perhaps some hard working young family could actually afford to move in to Wayne and maintain the diversity (economic/age/education/whatever)

Development and Smart Growth- musings

So I get the smart growth concept... and I understand the thinking around transit oriented development but I have to question some of the underlying assumptions.
1) Why do we need to have development at all? Why not redevelopment... reinvigorating our cities for example or some of the industrial towns.

2) Mass transit is wonderful. I am a strong proponent and really enjoyed when I worked in center city and took the train each day. Arrived at work refreshed, up to date on the news and ready to get down to work. BUT, the mass transit has to work for folks, it has to be able to get you to where you want to go. So how do transit oriented developments work without transit?

3)Often the "condos" that are part of the development are touted to be for empty nesters however the pricing doesn't compute for me. As an empty nester, if I were to sell my current home and more to a condo my goal would be to have excess funds as an outcome of the transaction to put towards my retirement. Even in Radnor, with our high property values, this goal is barely obtainable given the prices proposed.

4)Public benefits associated with these developments are often not properly evaluated since they are seen as "gifts" and in some cases they are the first victim of budget cuts.

5)Elected officials can be led astray by the potential income from the rate-ables associated with the project thus warding off tax increases.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Keating Presentation on Wayne

I attended the Keating presentation for the South Wayne development today. I understand that this is only a "concept plan" at this point but, quite frankly, I wasn't pleased. Too big, too much and what benefits come to my mind initially. The artist's concept showing the post office building with the new condo building looming up behind it, said it all for me...

It was wonderful to see the turnout. The meeting room was packed to overflowing. And there appeared to be unanimity in opposition to the project. I think it was summed up best by one of the commenter's who suggested that we don't need more housing units.

I recognize that this is only an initial presentation but there were far too many "We still have to investigate that" type of answers. Especially given the fact that the project has been festering for maybe 2 years.

The public sales pitch for the project is that we get a larger Library and Senior Center. I would like to see more public discussion about both of these items. I don't know if we really need this or not. For example, what is the role of a public library in the 21st century? As for the senior center, yes it is cramped, particularly from space for the staff perspective but is the need for service being met? Maybe the proposed space should be larger? We don't know.

There were lots of great questions from the audience particularly about parking and stormwater. One question was about the proposed parking being too far from the senior center. Apparently this had not been considered.... Several folks challenged the parking projections and assumptions, again the answers were weak.

I heard several interesting discussions in the lobby after the meeting. We all love conspiracies don't we? It was suggested that the Wayne Overlay took so long to allow this project to to be developed. Also, several folks were asking if the placement of the middle school was influenced by this project, eliminating the potential for two large buildings on opposite sides of South Wayne Avenue.

Stay tuned in folks, this will be another great ride.....